Subscribe to the Tuesday Briefing

Tuesday Briefing 路 No. 26 路 4 Aug, 2026

You gave good feedback. Nothing changed. Here's what was missing.

More feedback doesn't reliably produce more change. Gallup's research links frequent feedback to higher engagement, but only when it's timely, concrete, and comes from someone the recipient trusts. What actually moves behaviour is the conditions around the feedback - timing, specificity, and trust - far more than the volume of it.

Emily Rust

Emily Rust

Founder, Stones


Featured

The conversation that felt useful but changed nothing

Somewhere in the last few weeks you probably sat down with someone and talked about how they're showing up. It felt like a real conversation. You felt relieved to have had it. They engaged, maybe pushed back a little, seemed to take it in. Then more weeks passed, and you're watching the same patterns.

This is one of the most common and quietly frustrating experiences in leadership. Not because the feedback was wrong. Not because the person doesn't care. But because the conditions that make feedback land weren't in place before you delivered it.

The research

What the research actually says about feedback and change

Gallup's workplace research consistently links frequent, meaningful feedback to higher engagement - but the relationship is specific and correlational. It holds when the feedback is timely, concrete, and comes from someone the recipient genuinely believes is on their side. Strip those conditions away and the connection between feedback and behaviour change is far weaker than most leaders assume.

The instinct to give more feedback is understandable. It's also usually the wrong lever. What moves people is the environment the feedback arrives into, not the frequency of delivery.

Why feedback doesn't land

  1. 1

    It arrives too late

    Feedback given weeks after the event asks someone to reconstruct a moment their memory has already rewritten. The closer to the event, the more usable it is.

  2. 2

    It names behaviour, ignores conditions

    A conversation can be completely accurate about what's happening and entirely silent on why. Someone who isn't clear on expectations, lacks the tools to do the work, or is carrying more than they can hold won't be fixed by being told the output isn't good enough.

  3. 3

    It travels through a relationship that can't carry it

    The same words from two different leaders produce completely different responses, depending on whether the person believes you have their interests at heart.

Self-check

What you might recognise

None of these are failures. They're signals about what to adjust.

  • You've given the same feedback more than twice without visible change
  • You rehearse the conversation in your head for weeks before you have it
  • You soften the message each time you try again, until it barely resembles the original concern
  • People meet your feedback with explanation, defending rather than absorbing
  • You've held feedback back entirely because you weren't sure how to frame it, and the situation has drifted

What actually makes it work

  1. 1

    Start with conditions, not conversation

    Before any feedback lands, three things do most of the work: the person knows what good looks like, believes you want them to succeed, and hears it close enough to the event to act on it. Get those right and the conversation almost has itself.

  2. 2

    Make it specific and behavioural

    The Center for Creative Leadership's situation-behaviour-impact structure travels well: name where it happened, what you observed, and the effect it had, then stop and listen. "You need to communicate better" gives someone nothing to hold. "In Tuesday's client call, when you answered the pricing question before checking the brief, the client looked confused and we spent ten minutes recovering" gives them something they can picture and change.

  3. 3

    Pair care with direct challenge

    Kim Scott's work on Radical Candor adds a useful pairing: feedback that works comes from caring about the person and being willing to challenge them directly, at the same time. Challenge without care reads as harsh. Care without challenge slides into avoidance.

  4. 4

    Close the loop

    If you gave someone feedback three weeks ago, come back to it - not with an unspoken "did you fix it?" but with real curiosity about how it's been sitting.

Scripts worth having

  1. 1

    Opening the conversation

    "I want to share something I've been noticing, because I think you're capable of more than what I'm seeing right now. I'll be specific, then I'd like to hear how it looks from your side."

  2. 2

    Giving specific, behavioural feedback

    "In [situation], I noticed [behaviour]. The impact was [effect]. I'd like us to look at what could be different."

  3. 3

    When the same feedback hasn't landed

    "I've raised this before and I don't think I've explained it in a way that's useful yet. Can you tell me what you're hearing? I want us to get to something that actually helps."

  4. 4

    Closing the loop weeks later

    "I wanted to check how that conversation's been sitting with you. What's come up since?"

Three things you can do today

  1. 1

    Name what's stopping you

    Notice a piece of feedback you've been sitting on, and be honest with yourself about why. If it's discomfort, that's worth admitting. If it's timing, make the time this week rather than waiting for a moment that won't come.

  2. 2

    Ask before you tell

    In your next feedback conversation, open with "How do you think that's going?" before "here's what I noticed." Often people already know, and that changes what the conversation needs to be.

  3. 3

    Check for repeated feedback without change

    If anyone on your team keeps hearing the same thing without shifting, ask the harder question: have the conditions changed, or has the same message been delivered into the same situation and expected to produce a different result?

Go deeper

  • Gallup workplace research on feedback and engagement: Gallup
  • Situation-behaviour-impact feedback model: Center for Creative Leadership
  • Radical Candor: Kim Scott
Feedback works best as a relationship practice, not a corrective practice.
Emily
Emily Rust

That's all for this week's briefing.

Emily Rust 路 Founder, Stones

The archive

Every past edition

Browse the back catalogue. One leadership idea per week, all in one place.

Emily Rust

No. 25 路 28 Jul, 2026

Learning from what goes wrong, why most team reflection doesn't change anything, and what does

Most retrospectives are honest and well run. Then the next project surfaces the same problems.

Emily Rust

No. 24 路 21 Jul, 2026

Psychological safety: what it is, what it isn't, and what leaders can do to build it

Most leaders believe they've built it. Their teams often experience something more conditional.

Emily Rust

No. 23 路 14 Jul, 2026

Capacity, what shapes it, and what leaders can do about it

This week: what shapes your team's capacity, and a few small moves that give some of it back.

Emily Rust

No. 22 路 7 Jul, 2026

Meeting design, when the calendar is a symptom, not the problem

Most meeting frustrations aren't just about having too many meetings. They're about having the wrong kind.

Emily Rust

No. 21 路 30 Jun, 2026

Working hard isn't the same as moving forward

Mid-year is when direction, energy, and alignment quietly drift. Here's what a reset looks like.

Emily Rust

No. 20 路 23 Jun, 2026

When someone on your team is going through something hard

The line between being a decent human being and getting out of your depth, and how to stay on the right side of it.

The Tuesday Briefing

One idea, every Tuesday.

Join the leaders who start their week with one practical idea worth acting on.