Subscribe to the Tuesday Briefing
Tuesday Briefing · No. 11 · 21 Apr, 2026
You don't have to make a grand gesture. You just have to do the next small brave thing.

Emily Rust
Founder, Stones
Featured
Good morning. When most people think about courage in leadership, they picture the big moments. The difficult decision in the boardroom. The stand taken in the face of pressure. The leader who calls out the thing no one else will say.
Those moments matter. But they're not where leadership courage is actually built.
Courage, like trust, like confidence, like most things that matter in leadership, is a practice. It accumulates through repetition. And the repetitions that shape it most aren't the dramatic ones. They're the small, daily choices that most people barely notice: the moment you speak when it would be easier to stay quiet, the time you admit you don't know when it would be easier to bluff, the instant you redirect a conversation that's heading somewhere unhelpful.
These are acts of micro-bravery. And they compound.
Courage is not the absence of fear, but rather the judgement that something else is more important than fear.
There's a compelling body of research on the nature of courage that challenges the heroic narrative most of us grew up with. Cynthia Pury and Shane Lopez, in their edited volume The Psychology of Courage: Modern Research on an Ancient Virtue (APA, 2010), bring together research that distinguishes between dramatic, high-stakes acts of physical courage and the everyday courage required to act on values, speak honestly, and hold a position under social pressure.
A consistent finding across the work in this collection: everyday courage, the kind required in organisational life, is more common in its opportunities and more impactful in its cumulative effect than the single defining moment. Most leaders will never face a test that demands everything at once. But every leader faces dozens of small tests every week, and their responses to those tests, accumulated over time, are what define their character in the eyes of their team.
Brené Brown's research, published in Dare to Lead (2018), adds another dimension. Her seven years of research with leaders across industries consistently found that everyday acts of vulnerability and honesty, asking for help, admitting uncertainty, giving difficult feedback, disagreeing with a powerful voice in the room, form the foundation of trusted, resilient leadership cultures. These aren't bold gestures. They're practised habits.
The leaders who seem most naturally courageous aren't born that way. They've practised the small stuff so consistently that the bigger moments, when they arrive, feel like extensions of who they already are.
Micro-bravery isn't dramatic and it isn't comfortable. But it is recognisable. Here are some of the most common, and most consistently avoided, forms it takes in leadership:
Here's what's interesting about micro-bravery: it doesn't just build your own courage. It builds the culture's capacity for courage.
Leaders set the emotional temperature of their teams. When people observe a leader speaking honestly, admitting uncertainty, and engaging directly with difficulty, they receive implicit permission to do the same. Amy Edmondson's research on psychological safety, first published in Administrative Science Quarterly in 1999, identifies this shared belief that a team is safe for interpersonal risk-taking as a key predictor of team learning and performance. Importantly, Edmondson's work shows this is not built through policy or declarations, it is built through modelled behaviour, repeated consistently, over time.
Every time you choose the small brave thing, you are making it marginally safer for everyone around you to do the same. That marginal shift, accumulated across a team, across months and years, is what culture change actually looks like.
And the inverse is equally true. Every time a leader stays quiet when they should speak, softens what needs to be said, or defers to pressure they should push back against, they make it a little less safe for everyone else to be honest. This is how cultures of conflict-avoidance, performative agreement, and slow-burn dysfunction are built. Not by bad intent, but by accumulated small evasions.
One of the useful things about micro-bravery as a leadership practice is that it is entirely within your control. You don't need a mandate, a programme, or permission from above. You just need to notice the moment when something small and honest is available to you, and choose it.
A few questions worth sitting with:
Identify one deferred conversation
Something you've been putting off because it's uncomfortable. Not the most difficult one, just the next one. Commit to having it this week.
Practise saying 'I don't know' once today
In a meeting, in a one-to-one, wherever it's genuinely true. Notice what happens. It's almost always less consequential than you expected.
Name something that's going unsaid in your team
You don't have to resolve it. You just have to name it. "I've been noticing X, I'd like to understand it better." That's enough to start.
You don't need to be braver than you are. You just need to be brave enough for the next small moment. Then the one after that.

That's all for this week's briefing.
Emily Rust · Founder, Stones
The archive
Browse the back catalogue. One leadership idea per week, all in one place.
The Tuesday Briefing
Join the leaders who start their week with one practical idea worth acting on.