Subscribe to the Tuesday Briefing

Tuesday Briefing 路 No. 30 路 1 Sep, 2026

Limiting beliefs create a gap between what you believe you can do and what you can actually do

A role came up. You found the two things you didn't have experience in and didn't apply. Someone with less experience did, and they've been fine. That gap, between what you're capable of and what you believe is on offer, is the most moveable thing on your desk right now, and this week's briefing is about closing it.

Emily Rust

Emily Rust

Founder, Stones


Featured

What was actually doing the deciding

A role came up last year that you'd have been good at. You read the description twice, found the two things you couldn't do, and didn't put your name forward. Someone with less experience did, and they've been fine.

Or there was the meeting where you had the better idea and let it go, because it wasn't fully formed and you'd have had to interrupt to say it.

Neither of those felt like a limiting belief at the time. They probably felt like an accurate reading of the situation in front of you. That's what makes this particular gap so easy to miss, and so worth looking at.

When strategy and story conflict, your story will always win out. Not dramatically, quietly.
Nicola Taylor, co-founder, Tax Traders

What Nicola means by 'story'

Nicola Taylor said this at the Revved summit in Auckland this month, talking about organisations. It holds just as firmly for the strategy you've set for yourself.

By story she doesn't mean your goals, which are written down somewhere. She doesn't mean your capability, which is usually higher than you're giving it credit for. She means the working assumptions you've never said out loud, because they don't feel like assumptions at all. They feel like a description of how things are.

  • I'm not the person who does that sort of thing.
  • I got lucky with that one.
  • I'm too junior to say that in front of him.

Nobody argues with these, because nobody notices they're holding one. They quietly decide which options turn up for you in the first place, well before you get anywhere near making a choice. Which also means they're sitting somewhere you can get at.

Why more competence rarely shifts it

More competence rarely shifts a story on its own, because you end up with more data and read it the same way. The filter is still in place.

What does shift it is evidence you go out and collect on purpose. Not evidence that arrives and gets quietly filed as luck or an exception. Evidence you name, write down, and let land.

The research

Forty-six days

Roger Bannister ran a mile in under four minutes in May 1954. The record before his had stood since 1945. That's nine years of very good runners not doing it.

Forty-six days later, John Landy ran it faster. Within a few years it was an ordinary standard for elite middle-distance runners.

Nothing physical changed in that time. As Nicola put it, the mile hadn't changed, the pain of the race hadn't changed, the brutal training hadn't changed. What changed was what runners understood to be possible. Previously, they had been certain it was impossible.

The capability had been sitting there the whole time. That's the useful half of this is: a story can hold you a long way below what you can do, and it can also let go and push you above what you thought possible.

Four things you can do to reframe the narrative

  1. 1

    Name it

    Write the belief down in the words it uses, the way it turns up in your head at six in the morning, not the tidy professional version. Writing it down turns it from a fact into a claim. You'll know you've got the real one because it's slightly embarrassing to see on paper.

  2. 2

    Interrogate it

    Where did this come from, and what evidence is it resting on? A lot of them trace back to one bad experience some years ago, involving people who have all long since moved on.

  3. 3

    Test it with something small

    One thing the story says won't go well. Not a career move. Put your name forward. Say the half-formed idea in the room. Send the message to the person you've decided is too senior to bother.

  4. 4

    Let the evidence rewrite it

    This is the step people skip, and it's the one that pays. Notice what happened and say it to yourself plainly, or you'll file the result as luck or an exception and keep the rule intact. Write down what happened, next to the belief you wrote first.

What would change for you, for your organisation and for this country if you chose a different story starting today?
Nicola Taylor, co-founder, Tax Traders

Practical

The question Nicola left the room at Revved with

Worth remembering that the one you're running now was chosen too. Not deliberately, and probably not by you, but chosen. Which means it's available to be chosen again.

And when a room full of people each quietly test what they've decided is available to them, that's the thing we usually call a change in culture.

Start with one sentence written down, and one small thing tried before Friday.

Emily Rust

That's all for this week's briefing.

Emily Rust 路 Founder, Stones

The archive

Every past edition

Browse the back catalogue. One leadership idea per week, all in one place.

Emily Rust

No. 29 路 25 Aug, 2026

One team wobbles for a fortnight and gets on with it. The other doesn't. Here's what separates them.

Two teams, same organisation, same disruption. One recovers. The other doesn't, and it has nothing to do with the capability of the people in it. The difference is that resilience isn't a personality trait some teams happen to have. It's a practice, and practices have structures underneath them, and structures can be built on purpose.

Emily Rust

No. 28 路 18 Aug, 2026

You don't have a position on AI yet. Neither does almost anyone else.

If you're not sure where you stand on AI, you're in the majority, not behind. The more pressing reality is that your people are almost certainly already using it, with or without a policy in place. This isn't a technology question to hand off. It's a leadership question, and it's one you already know how to answer.

Emily Rust

No. 27 路 11 Aug, 2026

Same type of problem, just add a few zeros

Most of us assume that when something truly big lands, it requires something we don't yet have. It doesn't. That feeling is just what every complex problem looks like on approach, before it has any depth or shape. The way you lead on an ordinary Tuesday is exactly what you'll be drawing on when the big decision arrives.

Emily Rust

No. 26 路 4 Aug, 2026

You gave good feedback. Nothing changed. Here's what was missing.

More feedback doesn't reliably produce more change. Gallup's research links frequent feedback to higher engagement, but only when it's timely, concrete, and comes from someone the recipient trusts. What actually moves behaviour is the conditions around the feedback - timing, specificity, and trust - far more than the volume of it.

Emily Rust

No. 25 路 28 Jul, 2026

Learning from what goes wrong, why most team reflection doesn't change anything, and what does

Most retrospectives are honest and well run. Then the next project surfaces the same problems.

Emily Rust

No. 24 路 21 Jul, 2026

Psychological safety: what it is, what it isn't, and what leaders can do to build it

Most leaders believe they've built it. Their teams often experience something more conditional.

The Tuesday Briefing

One idea, every Tuesday.

Join the leaders who start their week with one practical idea worth acting on.