Subscribe to the Tuesday Briefing

Tuesday Briefing · No. 8 · 31 Mar, 2026

From manager to multiplier

Stop being the bottleneck. Start amplifying the intelligence around you.

Emily Rust

Emily Rust

Founder, Stones


Featured

Good morning. Here’s a question worth sitting with: Is your team smarter with you in the room, or do they do their best thinking when you’re not?

If you hesitated, you’re not alone. And if the honest answer is the second option, you’re in good company too. Most capable, driven leaders become bottlenecks without ever intending to. Not because they’re controlling. Because they care. Because they’re good at what they do. Because saying yes is faster than coaching someone else to figure it out.

But there’s a ceiling on what that approach can build, and at some point, the smartest thing a leader can do is stop being the answer and start being the condition under which better answers emerge.

That’s the shift from manager to multiplier.

The art of leadership is not to spend your time with your strengths, but to make your weaknesses irrelevant.
Peter Drucker

Why this matters more than it used to

The environments most leaders are navigating right now don’t reward the person with the most answers. They reward the team with the most collective intelligence, the capacity to think, adapt, and move together, fast.

Research by organisational psychologist Adam Grant and others in the field of team effectiveness consistently points to the same finding: the highest-performing teams aren’t led by the loudest or most experienced voice in the room. They’re led by people who create the conditions for others to contribute fully.

And yet, despite knowing this, many leaders still default to the hub-and-spoke model. Everything flows through them. Decisions stall at their desk. People stop bringing solutions because they’ve learned to bring problems and wait.

The consequences compound quietly. A 2022 McKinsey study on organisational health found that teams with high decision-making autonomy, where people had real ownership and weren’t waiting for sign-off on routine matters, were significantly more likely to report high performance and low attrition. The bottleneck isn’t just an efficiency problem. It’s a retention and engagement problem too.

Over time, this doesn’t just limit output. It limits people. It quietly tells your team: your thinking isn’t quite trusted here.

The accidental bottleneck

There are several ways capable leaders inadvertently become the ceiling on their team’s performance:

  • Answering before asking.: When someone brings you a problem, your first instinct is to solve it. Efficient in the moment, disempowering over time. You’ve just trained them to come back with the next one.
  • Deciding what only you could delegate.: High ownership is a strength, until it means nothing moves without you. The question isn’t whether you can make every call. It’s whether you should.
  • Being the most vocal in the room.: If you consistently speak first or most, you’re crowding out the thinking of others, often without realising it. Your position shapes what people feel safe to say. Research on status and speaking time consistently shows that senior voices, even unintentionally, compress the contributions of others.
  • Rescuing too quickly.: When someone struggles, jumping in feels helpful. But productive struggle is where capability builds. There’s a difference between support and substitution.

None of these behaviours come from bad intent. Most come from competence, urgency, or genuine care. But their cumulative effect is the same: a team that underperforms its potential.

What multipliers actually do

The concept of multiplying leadership has been explored across several bodies of research, from Liz Wiseman’s work on how leaders either amplify or diminish the intelligence around them, to psychological safety research by Amy Edmondson at Harvard, to self-determination theory, which identifies autonomy, mastery, and purpose as the core drivers of intrinsic motivation.

What the research consistently shows is that multiplying leaders share a handful of defining behaviours:

  • They ask more than they tell.: The multiplier’s default move is the question, not the answer. Not rhetorical questions, real ones. “What do you think?” “What have you already tried?” “What would you do if I wasn’t available?” This isn’t passivity. It’s deliberate activation of someone else’s capability.
  • They make their thinking visible, not their conclusions.: Rather than announcing decisions, they share the reasoning behind them. “Here’s what I’m weighing up…” This invites people into the thinking process and builds their ability to reason the same way next time.
  • They create space to be wrong.: Edmondson’s research on psychological safety shows that teams perform significantly better when people feel safe to take interpersonal risks, to speak up, challenge, experiment, and fail without consequences to their standing. Leaders create or destroy that safety through small, daily signals.
  • They redistribute the work of thinking.: They notice when they’re carrying cognitive load that belongs to others, and they consciously return it. “You’re closer to this than I am, what’s your read?”
  • They develop people at the pace of the work.: Rather than pulling someone aside for a coaching conversation once a month, they use real work as the development vehicle. The meeting debrief. The post-project reflection. The stretch assignment with real stakes.

Wiseman’s research, drawn from interviews with over 150 leaders across four continents, found that multiplier leaders got, on average, twice the capability from their people compared to their diminisher counterparts, not by demanding more, but by creating the conditions for more to emerge.

What it looks like in practice

  • Before your next meeting:: Ask yourself, who in this room do I want to hear from more? Then create the conditions for it. Assign a question in advance. Invite a quieter voice first. Hold your own contribution until others have contributed.
  • When someone brings you a problem:: Pause before solving. Try: “What options are you considering?” or “What would you do if I wasn’t around?” You don’t have to withhold your view, but sequence it last, not first.
  • When you’re about to decide something:: Ask whether this decision builds or diminishes someone else’s capability. If someone on your team could make this call, and grow from making it, what’s the cost of handing it to them? What’s the cost of not?
  • When things go wrong:: Resist the pull to take over. Instead, stay alongside: “What’s your plan from here? What do you need from me?” The message this sends, that you trust them to recover, not just to succeed, is one of the most powerful things a leader can communicate.
  • In how you give credit:: Multipliers are deliberate about attribution. They make other people’s contributions visible, to the team, to the organisation, to senior stakeholders. Visibility is currency. Sharing it costs you nothing and builds enormous goodwill and motivation.

Three things you can do today

  1. 1

    Run a ‘bottleneck audit.’

    Think about the last five decisions that came to you this week. Which of them genuinely needed you? Which ones could, and should, have been made by someone on your team?

  2. 2

    Ask before you answer.

    In your next one-to-one or team conversation, lead with a question instead of a solution. Notice what comes back. Notice what you learn.

  3. 3

    Name someone’s thinking out loud.

    In your next meeting, explicitly credit a team member’s idea or analysis in a way that makes it visible to others. Watch what it does to the room.

Recommendations

  • Watch:: How the best leaders make everyone smarter, Judtih Jamieson (3 mins)
  • Watch:: The accidental Diminisher, Liz Wiseman
  • Read:: The Coaching Habit, Michael Bungay Stanier
  • Read:: Teaming, by Amy Edmondson. On psychological safety and collective intelligence in action

The smartest move you can make might be to stop being the smartest person in the room.

Emily Rust

That's all for this week's briefing.

Emily Rust · Founder, Stones

The archive

Every past edition

Browse the back catalogue. One leadership idea per week, all in one place.

Emily Rust

No. 25 · 28 Jul, 2026

Learning from what goes wrong, why most team reflection doesn't change anything, and what does

Most retrospectives are honest and well run. Then the next project surfaces the same problems.

Emily Rust

No. 24 · 21 Jul, 2026

Psychological safety: what it is, what it isn't, and what leaders can do to build it

Most leaders believe they've built it. Their teams often experience something more conditional.

Emily Rust

No. 23 · 14 Jul, 2026

Capacity, what shapes it, and what leaders can do about it

This week: what shapes your team's capacity, and a few small moves that give some of it back.

Emily Rust

No. 22 · 7 Jul, 2026

Meeting design, when the calendar is a symptom, not the problem

Most meeting frustrations aren't just about having too many meetings. They're about having the wrong kind.

Emily Rust

No. 21 · 30 Jun, 2026

Working hard isn't the same as moving forward

Mid-year is when direction, energy, and alignment quietly drift. Here's what a reset looks like.

Emily Rust

No. 20 · 23 Jun, 2026

When someone on your team is going through something hard

The line between being a decent human being and getting out of your depth, and how to stay on the right side of it.

The Tuesday Briefing

One idea, every Tuesday.

Join the leaders who start their week with one practical idea worth acting on.