Subscribe to the Tuesday Briefing
Tuesday Briefing 路 No. 37 路 3 Nov, 2026
Decisions rarely arrive one at a time, and in the run to year end they arrive in a flood. Most get the same few minutes of attention, whether they'll be forgotten by Friday or shape the whole of next year. The fix isn't better thinking in the moment. It's sorting decisions before you make them.

Emily Rust
Founder, Stones
The research
Paul Nutt spent two decades studying how decisions get made inside organisations. Across 356 decisions in medium to large organisations in the US and Canada, about half failed. The failures traced back to a familiar set of habits: settling on a solution early, limiting the search for alternatives, and pushing the plan through. The decisions that succeeded looked different. The need for action was clear from the outset, objectives were set, options were searched for broadly, and the right people were involved. None of those steps needs to be complicated. But each one takes a bit more time and intention than a rushed decision made on the fly.
The second piece of evidence explains why speed isn't the enemy everywhere. Daniel Kahneman and Gary Klein, from two schools of thought that usually disagree, set out to map when an experienced professional's intuition can actually be trusted. Their answer: it depends on the situation, not the person. Intuition earns trust when the situation is regular enough to learn from, and the person has had the chance to learn it through practice and feedback. In familiar territory, a quick call is often a good one. In unfamiliar territory, it's less reliable, and feeling certain tells you very little either way.
Put together, the many decisions you've made before deserve speed. The few that are new, consequential, or hard to undo deserve your best thinking.
The few that shape what comes next
High stakes, hard to reverse, or new to you. These deserve your clearest hour of the week, not your last one. Bring at least two real options to the table, involve the people who will live with the outcome, and try a pre-mortem: imagine it's a year from now and the decision has gone badly, then ask what happened. It gives people permission to name the risks that politeness usually keeps quiet.
The many you have made before
Familiar ground, where you've seen how things play out. Decide these quickly and let them go. Your experience is doing exactly the job it was built for, and every one you make fast hands time back to the decisions that genuinely need it.
The ones that can wait
Some decisions are better made later, with more information. The skill is making that a deliberate choice. Give each one a date or a trigger ("once the first-quarter numbers are in") and tell the people waiting. A decision deferred with a date is still a decision. One left to drift tends to get made for you, usually at a worse moment.
Ten minutes: sort what's in front of you
List the decisions currently on your plate and place each into one of the three categories. Most leaders find the first group is shorter than they feared.
Fifteen minutes: book your best hour
Identify the decision that matters most this week and block your clearest hour for it. Arrive with a second option and one person likely to see things differently.
Five minutes: give waiting decisions a date
For every decision that can wait, assign a date or a trigger, then let the people waiting know when they'll hear. That's all it takes to stop a deferred decision from drifting.
Practical
The leaders people most trust with big decisions are rarely the fastest to make them.
Their few important calls were clearly thought through, and their many small ones never kept anyone waiting. That's a characteristic worth building into your own approach: slow on purpose where it counts, and fast everywhere else.

That's all for this week's briefing.
Emily Rust 路 Founder, Stones
The archive
Browse the back catalogue. One leadership idea per week, all in one place.
The Tuesday Briefing
Join the leaders who start their week with one practical idea worth acting on.