Subscribe to the Tuesday Briefing

Tuesday Briefing 路 No. 37 路 3 Nov, 2026

The decisions that deserve your best hour

Decisions rarely arrive one at a time, and in the run to year end they arrive in a flood. Most get the same few minutes of attention, whether they'll be forgotten by Friday or shape the whole of next year. The fix isn't better thinking in the moment. It's sorting decisions before you make them.

Emily Rust

Emily Rust

Founder, Stones


Featured

The hidden cost of treating every decision the same

Right now, the decisions weighing on you probably aren't queuing politely. You might have a budget line to approve, a new role or hire to confirm, a stakeholder or customer waiting on an answer, a project that needs a call, and dozens of smaller junctions that require your involvement in between. Most get made in whatever gap appears, or when the noise around them get loudest.

That's entirely understandable. A leader's day tends to be built for responsiveness, and a quick answer in the moment usually feels like the helpful one. But the cost is real: every decision ends up getting roughly the same treatment, the same few minutes of attention, regardless of whether it will be forgotten by Friday or shape the whole of next year.

The research

What the evidence actually says about how decisions fail

Paul Nutt spent two decades studying how decisions get made inside organisations. Across 356 decisions in medium to large organisations in the US and Canada, about half failed. The failures traced back to a familiar set of habits: settling on a solution early, limiting the search for alternatives, and pushing the plan through. The decisions that succeeded looked different. The need for action was clear from the outset, objectives were set, options were searched for broadly, and the right people were involved. None of those steps needs to be complicated. But each one takes a bit more time and intention than a rushed decision made on the fly.

The second piece of evidence explains why speed isn't the enemy everywhere. Daniel Kahneman and Gary Klein, from two schools of thought that usually disagree, set out to map when an experienced professional's intuition can actually be trusted. Their answer: it depends on the situation, not the person. Intuition earns trust when the situation is regular enough to learn from, and the person has had the chance to learn it through practice and feedback. In familiar territory, a quick call is often a good one. In unfamiliar territory, it's less reliable, and feeling certain tells you very little either way.

Put together, the many decisions you've made before deserve speed. The few that are new, consequential, or hard to undo deserve your best thinking.

Three kinds of call

  1. 1

    The few that shape what comes next

    High stakes, hard to reverse, or new to you. These deserve your clearest hour of the week, not your last one. Bring at least two real options to the table, involve the people who will live with the outcome, and try a pre-mortem: imagine it's a year from now and the decision has gone badly, then ask what happened. It gives people permission to name the risks that politeness usually keeps quiet.

  2. 2

    The many you have made before

    Familiar ground, where you've seen how things play out. Decide these quickly and let them go. Your experience is doing exactly the job it was built for, and every one you make fast hands time back to the decisions that genuinely need it.

  3. 3

    The ones that can wait

    Some decisions are better made later, with more information. The skill is making that a deliberate choice. Give each one a date or a trigger ("once the first-quarter numbers are in") and tell the people waiting. A decision deferred with a date is still a decision. One left to drift tends to get made for you, usually at a worse moment.

Three things you can do today

  1. 1

    Ten minutes: sort what's in front of you

    List the decisions currently on your plate and place each into one of the three categories. Most leaders find the first group is shorter than they feared.

  2. 2

    Fifteen minutes: book your best hour

    Identify the decision that matters most this week and block your clearest hour for it. Arrive with a second option and one person likely to see things differently.

  3. 3

    Five minutes: give waiting decisions a date

    For every decision that can wait, assign a date or a trigger, then let the people waiting know when they'll hear. That's all it takes to stop a deferred decision from drifting.

Practical

The distinction that earns trust over time

The leaders people most trust with big decisions are rarely the fastest to make them.

Their few important calls were clearly thought through, and their many small ones never kept anyone waiting. That's a characteristic worth building into your own approach: slow on purpose where it counts, and fast everywhere else.

Emily Rust

That's all for this week's briefing.

Emily Rust 路 Founder, Stones

The archive

Every past edition

Browse the back catalogue. One leadership idea per week, all in one place.

Emily Rust

No. 36 路 13 Oct, 2026

The shift from leading individuals to leading the team as a unit

Most leadership tools are built for one person at a time, which trains us to see a team as a collection of individuals rather than something that functions between them. If you've led each of your people carefully and still sensed the group could be more, you're not doing it wrong. You just haven't been handed the right frame yet. Think like a coach.

Emily Rust

No. 35 路 6 Oct, 2026

You're conflating two decisions, and it's costing you the ideas in the room

Holding the destination firm is your job. Owning the route usually isn't. When leaders do both, they get a team that executes a plan only one person believes in. Two or three people in that last meeting privately concluded their route was better, and they're now unlikely to do much for the chosen one beyond what they're asked for.

Emily Rust

No. 34 路 29 Sep, 2026

The gap that protects your team is the one you have to protect on purpose

Two years ago the same team would have absorbed another thing without much drama. The work quietly filled every available hour, and once it had, there was nowhere left to put anything new. A team that looks fine at eighty per cent loaded can come apart at ninety-five, and the reason is almost never a single bad decision.

Emily Rust

No. 33 路 22 Sep, 2026

The scaffold doesn't loosen when the building is being altered

When change is underway, most leaders loosen structure out of a sense of care - slipping one-on-ones, letting meetings go patchy, describing the plan as evolving so 'let's catch up when it's settled'. It feels like the right thing to do. It isn't. People absorb change from a stable base, and when a lot is moving, a leader's job is to make sure a few things visibly are not.

Emily Rust

No. 32 路 15 Sep, 2026

You're not weighing two options. You're waiting for one of them to turn out to be easy.

We think we're weighing two options. We're waiting for one of them to turn out to be the easy. Since neither ever does, we hold the position, which feels like prudence and is a third option with costs of its own, accruing out of sight.

Emily Rust

No. 31 路 8 Sep, 2026

You know what they're good at. What they're capable of is still an open question.

Almost every leader is carrying an estimate of their people they've never actually tested. The problem is that familiar work can't reveal capability - it only confirms what you already know. This week: why stretch is the only thing that corrects the estimate, and how to design it so it builds people rather than flattens them.

The Tuesday Briefing

One idea, every Tuesday.

Join the leaders who start their week with one practical idea worth acting on.