News and updates

Hybrid Work Isn’t the Problem — Our Leadership Models Need Updating

 

TL;DR for Leaders

Research shows hybrid and flexible work succeed when leaders close four capability gaps:

1. Clarity of outcomes

2. Consistency of expectations

3. Team-designed collaboration rhythms

4. Capability & infrastructure to support distributed work

When these are in place, hybrid becomes a performance accelerator — and workplace friction drops significantly.

 

The Leadership Opportunity Hybrid Work Has Created

Over the past four years, employees have lived through the biggest work experiment in modern history. They proved they could deliver from anywhere, adapt at speed, and redesign processes under pressure.

Naturally, many now ask: “If we delivered through a global crisis, why can’t we deliver through everyday work?”

This might feel like entitlement — but it’s logic.

But many organisations are still using leadership models designed for a world where:

• everyone was co-located

• visibility signalled productivity

• proximity drove communication

• offices were the centre of gravity

That world has changed.  Most leadership systems haven’t.

Hybrid isn’t failing. Our leadership tools simply haven’t caught up yet.

Why Inconsistency — Not Hybrid — Creates Workplace Friction

Employees are not frustrated by flexibility. They are frustrated by inconsistent rules and applications of flexibility.

Common patterns across organisations include:

• Different managers interpreting “hybrid” differently

• Some teams enjoying autonomy, others tightly controlled

• Decisions based on preference, not principles

• Leaders unsure how to apply flexibility equitably

This creates a powerful sense of injustice — one of the biggest predictors of disengagement.

Hybrid only works when:

• expectations are clear

• norms are shared

• decisions are transparent

• fairness is visible

When this isn’t in place, hybrid feels arbitrary and unfair — not because employees disagree with flexibility, but because flexibility is unevenly executed.

This is a leadership capability issue, not a cultural one.

What the Research Shows

Across global studies, the evidence is strong:

• Hybrid does not harm productivity when well designed

• Hybrid reduces attrition by 20–35% in high-quality trials

• Remote models can improve productivity in certain roles

• Diverse teams innovate more effectively

• Intentional gatherings beat mandatory office days for connection

The organisations making hybrid work aren’t relying on policy. They’re investing in skills, systems, and clarity.

Two World-Class Organisations Leading the Way

1. Atlassian (Australia) — Team Anywhere

Atlassian designed hybrid as a capability system.

Key practices:

• Employees choose where they work each day

• No mandated office days

• Teams set their own collaboration agreements

• Quarterly intentional gatherings

• Performance measured through shared outcomes

Impact reported by Atlassian:

• No decline in work activity

• Expanded talent pool from 12 office anchors to >10,000 locations

• Improved retention and senior talent attraction

• Stronger team cohesion after intentional gatherings

This model blends autonomy with clarity — and it works.

2. Airbnb — Live and Work Anywhere

Airbnb reframed flexibility as strategic, not symbolic.

Key practices:

• Live and work almost anywhere in-country

• No pay penalty for relocating

• Clear rituals and connection points

• Intentional team gatherings

Impact shared by Airbnb:

• Lower turnover

• Stronger diversity

• Higher attraction of top talent

• High employee satisfaction

Flexibility + clarity = competitive advantage.

Four Capabilities Leaders Need to Make Hybrid Succeed

These are the minimum requirements, backed by research, that leaders need to implement.

1. Clarity of outcomes

People work best when they know what good looks like.

Leaders must provide:

• 3–5 clear, shared priorities

• Team-level goals

• Transparent progress

• Weekly and monthly rhythm updates

Clarity is the antidote to micromanagement.

2. Consistency of expectations

Hybrid must feel fair, not discretionary. Fairness drives trust.

Leaders should ensure:

• Roles are classified consistently

• Expectations are transparent

• Reasons behind team differences are shared

• Flexibility is applied by principles, not preferences

3. Clarity Team-designed collaboration rhythms

Teams know their work best. Leaders set principles; teams design the practice.

Teams should define:

• Core collaboration windows

• What work is synchronous vs asynchronous

• When and why in-person time matters

• Shared norms for responsiveness

• How decisions get made

This creates predictable, low-friction working patterns.

4. Capability & infrastructure

Hybrid fails without tooling and skills.

Leaders need:

• Training on leading distributed teams

• Space design for collaboration, not presence

• Budget for team gatherings

• Digital tools to support async work

• A shared playbook for hybrid rituals

Hybrid becomes effective only when leaders are equipped.

How Leaders Can Start Today

You don’t need perfection — just momentum.

1. Define what matters most: Clarify 3–5 team outcomes.

2. Document your team’s working agreement: Co-design collaboration rhythms.

3. Make decisions transparent: Explain the “why” behind your hybrid approach.

4. Invest in intentional connection: Run purposeful gatherings, not mandated office days.

5. Give managers the tools they need: Equip them — don’t expect them to improvise.

When leaders do this, hybrid becomes:

• fairer

• calmer

• more productive

• more predictable

• more human

• more effective

 

The future of work isn’t about where people sit. It’s about how we help them succeed.